2015年十大最差独角兽:Evernote和Dropbox上榜|独角兽|创业公司_新浪科技_新浪网



2015年十大最差独角兽:Evernote和Dropbox上榜|独角兽|创业公司_新浪科技_新浪网

  如果你获得了足够的风投,可能会因此跻身"独角兽"的行列,但这并不能确保你一定能最终成功。

  但对于各路撰写年度10大最差独角兽的记者来说,这却是件好事。

  寻找糟糕独角兽的工作似乎变得非常容易,因为我们耳熟能详的创业公司几乎都是独角兽,所以似乎选材丰富。

  不过,要完成这项工作仍然并非易事,因为需要筛选的企业过多。如何对不同企业的糟糕状况进行排序呢?除此之外,还应当考虑一个问题,所谓的"最糟"本身就包含许多主观因素。

  应该按照财务业绩来看?还是按照估值下滑程度来比较?

  但有一件事情是确定的:随着时间的流逝,这项工作将会越来越简单。据TechCrunch统计,全球共有156家独角兽,Uber以510亿美元的估值位居首位。但自从2011年以来,只有21家独角兽成功退出,有的通过IPO,有的则借助并购交易。

  这两个数据之间的巨大落差挖出了一条"独角兽死亡谷",预计今后几年还将有越来越多的独角兽尸体堆积于此。


Read full article from 2015年十大最差独角兽:Evernote和Dropbox上榜|独角兽|创业公司_新浪科技_新浪网


No comments:

Post a Comment

Labels

Algorithm (219) Lucene (130) LeetCode (97) Database (36) Data Structure (33) text mining (28) Solr (27) java (27) Mathematical Algorithm (26) Difficult Algorithm (25) Logic Thinking (23) Puzzles (23) Bit Algorithms (22) Math (21) List (20) Dynamic Programming (19) Linux (19) Tree (18) Machine Learning (15) EPI (11) Queue (11) Smart Algorithm (11) Operating System (9) Java Basic (8) Recursive Algorithm (8) Stack (8) Eclipse (7) Scala (7) Tika (7) J2EE (6) Monitoring (6) Trie (6) Concurrency (5) Geometry Algorithm (5) Greedy Algorithm (5) Mahout (5) MySQL (5) xpost (5) C (4) Interview (4) Vi (4) regular expression (4) to-do (4) C++ (3) Chrome (3) Divide and Conquer (3) Graph Algorithm (3) Permutation (3) Powershell (3) Random (3) Segment Tree (3) UIMA (3) Union-Find (3) Video (3) Virtualization (3) Windows (3) XML (3) Advanced Data Structure (2) Android (2) Bash (2) Classic Algorithm (2) Debugging (2) Design Pattern (2) Google (2) Hadoop (2) Java Collections (2) Markov Chains (2) Probabilities (2) Shell (2) Site (2) Web Development (2) Workplace (2) angularjs (2) .Net (1) Amazon Interview (1) Android Studio (1) Array (1) Boilerpipe (1) Book Notes (1) ChromeOS (1) Chromebook (1) Codility (1) Desgin (1) Design (1) Divide and Conqure (1) GAE (1) Google Interview (1) Great Stuff (1) Hash (1) High Tech Companies (1) Improving (1) LifeTips (1) Maven (1) Network (1) Performance (1) Programming (1) Resources (1) Sampling (1) Sed (1) Smart Thinking (1) Sort (1) Spark (1) Stanford NLP (1) System Design (1) Trove (1) VIP (1) tools (1)

Popular Posts