找工作同样内推,为啥有人成功了,而你却不行?- 来自苹果公司员工的建议 | 美国留学就业规划|Warald咨询



找工作同样内推,为啥有人成功了,而你却不行?- 来自苹果公司员工的建议 | 美国留学就业规划|Warald咨询

从结果上来看,内推可以增加面试的几率,有大概十几个人和我说拿到了面试,但是最后只有一两个人收到了offer。所以面试概率在1/10左右,成功概率在1/100左右。 竞争还是挺激烈的。

推了这么多人,发现从请求内推这件小事里还是能看出各人的素质水平的确高低各异,有的人做得就比较周全,但也有人做得很糙,很难想象以这种态度能够通过层层选拔。这里就和大家分享一些观点,对事不对人。

最基本的一点,要求内推至少把之前的文章仔细看完吧,就好像要做解决问题必须先把题目看明白。我明确说了苹果需要先找匹配的职位,把简历和request number一起发给我才会比较有效,但还是有人直接单发了简历过来。还有人说根据自己的简历可以让我帮忙找合适他的职位。开始我还回复下说最好自己找好把号码补发给我,后来人多了我也就直接把简历放到系统里,但是这样被选中的可能性必然大大降低了。的确我那时候也觉得不知道自己能做什么,但是努力地去网上查查有什么比较符合的职位,这点要求不过分吧?还有人还发站内信问我联系方式,邮箱已经附在帖子上了,如果还找不到估计也通不过面试。。。


Read full article from 找工作同样内推,为啥有人成功了,而你却不行?- 来自苹果公司员工的建议 | 美国留学就业规划|Warald咨询


No comments:

Post a Comment

Labels

Algorithm (219) Lucene (130) LeetCode (97) Database (36) Data Structure (33) text mining (28) Solr (27) java (27) Mathematical Algorithm (26) Difficult Algorithm (25) Logic Thinking (23) Puzzles (23) Bit Algorithms (22) Math (21) List (20) Dynamic Programming (19) Linux (19) Tree (18) Machine Learning (15) EPI (11) Queue (11) Smart Algorithm (11) Operating System (9) Java Basic (8) Recursive Algorithm (8) Stack (8) Eclipse (7) Scala (7) Tika (7) J2EE (6) Monitoring (6) Trie (6) Concurrency (5) Geometry Algorithm (5) Greedy Algorithm (5) Mahout (5) MySQL (5) xpost (5) C (4) Interview (4) Vi (4) regular expression (4) to-do (4) C++ (3) Chrome (3) Divide and Conquer (3) Graph Algorithm (3) Permutation (3) Powershell (3) Random (3) Segment Tree (3) UIMA (3) Union-Find (3) Video (3) Virtualization (3) Windows (3) XML (3) Advanced Data Structure (2) Android (2) Bash (2) Classic Algorithm (2) Debugging (2) Design Pattern (2) Google (2) Hadoop (2) Java Collections (2) Markov Chains (2) Probabilities (2) Shell (2) Site (2) Web Development (2) Workplace (2) angularjs (2) .Net (1) Amazon Interview (1) Android Studio (1) Array (1) Boilerpipe (1) Book Notes (1) ChromeOS (1) Chromebook (1) Codility (1) Desgin (1) Design (1) Divide and Conqure (1) GAE (1) Google Interview (1) Great Stuff (1) Hash (1) High Tech Companies (1) Improving (1) LifeTips (1) Maven (1) Network (1) Performance (1) Programming (1) Resources (1) Sampling (1) Sed (1) Smart Thinking (1) Sort (1) Spark (1) Stanford NLP (1) System Design (1) Trove (1) VIP (1) tools (1)

Popular Posts