微软 Windows 团队的程序员质量在下降吗? - 知乎



微软 Windows 团队的程序员质量在下降吗? - 知乎

看到有几个答主把锅甩给有没有测试团队去了——连续说了好几遍"主要不是程序员,而是测试团队"。然后说,主要原因是因为主管抠门撤销了测试团队,所以导致质量下滑。是这个逻辑吧。

有没有测试团队会不会导致质量下滑?

那么,当微软有大规模的测试团队的时候,他们的软件质量就很好了么?(以前(十年前)还有文章说过微软的开发和测试的比例是比较高的——好像是1个QA对付3个DEV之类的)

  • Windows 95/98/me这几个版本的操作系统在质量渣的方面不相伯仲,微软在这5-6年内更新了多少个版本,什么win98第二版,还有好多Service Pack,但质量上还是渣,每两周重装一次操作系统的经历大家都经历过么?千万不要拿什么第三方的驱动程序或是软件来说事,也不要说兼容16bit的DOS程序来说来事,核心问题就是因为设计上的缺陷,有大量的测试人员无济于事。然后,以NT技术的win2k开如拯救微软直到XP,然后,Vista出现后,质量又开始出问题,然后win7又好了一个版本,现在的win8/win10的质量,老实说,比95/98/me/Vista好多了。

Read full article from 微软 Windows 团队的程序员质量在下降吗? - 知乎


No comments:

Post a Comment

Labels

Algorithm (219) Lucene (130) LeetCode (97) Database (36) Data Structure (33) text mining (28) Solr (27) java (27) Mathematical Algorithm (26) Difficult Algorithm (25) Logic Thinking (23) Puzzles (23) Bit Algorithms (22) Math (21) List (20) Dynamic Programming (19) Linux (19) Tree (18) Machine Learning (15) EPI (11) Queue (11) Smart Algorithm (11) Operating System (9) Java Basic (8) Recursive Algorithm (8) Stack (8) Eclipse (7) Scala (7) Tika (7) J2EE (6) Monitoring (6) Trie (6) Concurrency (5) Geometry Algorithm (5) Greedy Algorithm (5) Mahout (5) MySQL (5) xpost (5) C (4) Interview (4) Vi (4) regular expression (4) to-do (4) C++ (3) Chrome (3) Divide and Conquer (3) Graph Algorithm (3) Permutation (3) Powershell (3) Random (3) Segment Tree (3) UIMA (3) Union-Find (3) Video (3) Virtualization (3) Windows (3) XML (3) Advanced Data Structure (2) Android (2) Bash (2) Classic Algorithm (2) Debugging (2) Design Pattern (2) Google (2) Hadoop (2) Java Collections (2) Markov Chains (2) Probabilities (2) Shell (2) Site (2) Web Development (2) Workplace (2) angularjs (2) .Net (1) Amazon Interview (1) Android Studio (1) Array (1) Boilerpipe (1) Book Notes (1) ChromeOS (1) Chromebook (1) Codility (1) Desgin (1) Design (1) Divide and Conqure (1) GAE (1) Google Interview (1) Great Stuff (1) Hash (1) High Tech Companies (1) Improving (1) LifeTips (1) Maven (1) Network (1) Performance (1) Programming (1) Resources (1) Sampling (1) Sed (1) Smart Thinking (1) Sort (1) Spark (1) Stanford NLP (1) System Design (1) Trove (1) VIP (1) tools (1)

Popular Posts